Abhishek Vijayvargia :
there are following two possibilities
1)
there is some printing mistake
in the 2nd production rule
there should be T instead of F
means it should be like these
T->FT/*FT/e
2)and if it is not the case then T becomes useless symbol n entire grammer becomes
E->e
and first(E)= e
follow(E)={$}
and grammer is LL(1)
but most probably i think it may b the 1st case bcoz I am not sure about 2nd case bcoz in 2nd case there is no terminal symbol and grammer itself becomes useless
Abhishek Vijayvargia :
there are following two possibilities
1)
there is some printing mistake
in the 2nd production rule
there should be T instead of F
means it should be like these
T->FT/*FT/e
2)and if it is not the case then T becomes useless symbol n entire grammer becomes
E->e
and first(E)= e
follow(E)={$}
and grammer is LL(1)
but most probably i think it may b the 1st case bcoz I am not sure about 2nd case bcoz in 2nd case there is no terminal symbol and grammer itself becomes useless